Apparently if you don’t have kids, you are an ‘evolutionary failing’. I’ve some sympathy for unhappy parents but this seems so unnecessarily bitter just. It’s not our fault you’re life is the way it is! And I don’t get the logic behind this even? If you don’t have kids, you are an ‘evolutionary failing’ Evidently.
I have some sympathy for disappointed parents but this just seems so unnecessarily bitter. It’s not our problem, you’re life is the way it is! And I don’t even get the reasoning behind this? And I don’t even get the reasoning behind this? Evolutionary fitness is essentially the amount of the fitness of your respective offspring (to a 1st-order approximation).
Ergo, an organism with no offspring has zero fitness and is an evolutionary failure. An organism’s evolutionary fitness is not that organism’s value as a person, however. We can choose our very own measure. I think it’s more of an evolutionary failing to replicate to a spot where everyone will perish. Exactly. The OP in the initial post is right about CF being ‘evolutionary failures’. But as frightening as it seems, the term ‘failing’ is in it after all, it is nothing to be concerned about. Links and Discussion of interest to children individuals.
95%. This is best achieved without ever achieving 100% (or perhaps even crossing 97.5%) of TM until a retest of TM is desired. Novice lifters can retest training maxes more often than advanced lifters. It’s advocated that TM tests not be … Read more